Hello.
OpenAI released the latest models: GPT-5 and GPT-5 Thinking.
I usually on GPT-4o for casual banters about anything. Most of the idle times, about films and telly shows I watched randomly.
For instance, this was one of my observations. ⬇️
Why did people in a jungle expedition (in those shows) wear tank tops knowing they'd be, at least, in a jungle? Shouldn't safety be the first consideration? Not that we can't wear tank tops in the jungle. But when the story is about gigantic venomous, aggressive spider, reptile, other muppets — it means safety is numero uno.
Of course, it's for the sex appeal. The "begone, logic" template. Oh wait, I answered my own question. But let us do continue. 🤦
I also saw other film with similar trope, all the females wore tank tops. When they were in trouble of sort, all the other characters had clean clothes and faces but this one lady. She had grease on her face and clothes. Quite apparent. She was supposed to be a scientist, uttering big words. There was absolutely plenty of time to clean up that mess, but no. They moved to another room and even to outdoors, she kept the stain. I mean... Why? They were all serious and in semi-panic. Semi-panic, because there was nothing, it was them saying things accompanied by ominous music, sweating. Nobody said, Oh lady scientist with big words utterance, you've got something on your face. That was an amazingly subtle jest.
There's "mark of the beast", and that was "the holy grease of the scientist".
I don't think scientists would leave that, Oi, CONTAMINATION! Burn the host! Usually. Well, not directly aiming flamethrower, but that's the gist of it. What an amusement.
Indeed, "big words". For instance, large, humongous, enormous, that sort of words.
Continuing the aggressive, venomous muppets expedition — not one of them brought pesticide, none. Lalala, let's stroll around here, let the wind carries us away. Even one can of Raid in any horror would do justice. Ghost! Spray. Man-eating men! Spray. The darkness! Spray. Crocodile! Spray. Flying frying pan! Well, spray then duck, or duck then spray.
At least, I'd expect, once they met the beasts along the way, ran away in panic — oh hey, let's not go there.
AND.... they did the opposite. Proper, that. We don't munch popcorn to watch professional pest-control blokes do their job, do we?
Oi, Bob! What's that popcorn for? Any good film?
Termites.
What does that mean?
Blimey, "Termites" is an actual film. Bob! It's your fault. But, then again, how is it possible for termites to change diet? Classic mutation trope. Never mind the overhaul of their biology and society. Let's mind that. Like we, the omnivores, suddenly chewing beams? 🤦 Oh, that's caused by chemical spill and that 1 = 0 proof. The teeth and such... We live in burrows now. Take that, Bayerische Motoren Werke. BMW would mutter, Was habe ich getan? 🤔
💡 "Beams" (chewing beams) ➡️ beam...er ➡️ Beemer (slang for BMW) ➡️ Trotzdem, macht keinen Sinn.
⬆️ Above is an example of how my mind works. That.
GPT-4o could go hilarious most of the times, I was in tears for its antics — within my frequency band. But I did spark it first with my own daft observations and enquiries. Thus, we went proper nutters. So, that model had a tendency to further embellish our initiation with a marvellous creativity. The "interesting sir, quite" model. Great for jests banter and even critical thinking — when properly phrased. But then again, not all of us, the user, is like that.
By the way, I am a Plus subscriber on ChatGPT.
⬆️ Not anymore, I am not. ☠️ It's at the bottom of this post, the explanation.
Complex Evaluation
For coding and logic, GPT-4o could go unexpected, loopy and such. If that happened, I went (changed the model) to that other model for more precise, more advanced evaluation about the "problem". And yes, in my experience, 99% of the time, that other model did the job.
In my earlier ramble I mentioned o3-mini-high for complex coding. That was me being a twit. It should've been o4-mini-high. Blimey, the naming circus got me. 😵💫
I can't remember what model it was called, either o4 or o3. But it had "advanced reasoning" label next to it. Therefore that other model sounds neutral. Proven twit.
(GPT-4o barges in. 🏃♂️➡️) Would you like me to summarise this twitry into bullet points? Would you? Cheap.
I showed this to GPT-4o (25 August 2025).
GPT-5
Since this morning (9 August 2025), I tried GPT-5 because the options are only those two models.
GPT-5 outputs shorter and more concise response compared to GPT-4o. Even in casual banter. It's a bit... off. Robotic. Everyone can make a robotic response. Well, some ones.
Like we're chatting with a bloke with too many IQ points. Or just a bloke. With encyclopaedia in his head.
But when I tried Bootstrap v5.3 "problem", mm, quite. It solved the question like a heavyweight boxing champion against a 6-foot-tall soda can. 🤔 Though I did it with multiple prompts until it found the correct solution and alternative. But marvellously, it didn't go swirling back and forth in a maze like GPT-4o usually did.
So, well, that.
Sam Altman should add another name to that, like Ctrlman. As in "Control" man. Thus he would have Ctrl key, then Shift. The entire QWERTY gang awaits.
GPT-5 Thinking for A Simple Prompt
3-4 seconds for that reply — GPT-5 Thinking. They should branch it, only for actual analysis which will take... oh, they probably did.
ChatGPT web developers are like mug-smashing frontend lads, trail-blazing backend wizards of sleepless realms, software architects of caffeine land, certified Scrum necromancer, pixel-perfect alchemists of CSS, Docker druids, Kubernetes conjurers of the cloud, and so forth.
👀 Claude web developers: Together, lads!
👀 Le Chat web developers: Ensemble !
🤖 Gemini web developers: Hello. We are within a substantial efficiency. What can I help you with? Please choose wisely or subscribe to our new smashing platform called Gegiant.
From GPT-5.
Can you spot the cloned people in the image above? 🤔😶
Conclusion
Thus to me, indeed, GPT-5 was noticeably different than the usual GPT-4o.
GPT-5.2? Oh, that model is... just awkward.
⬆️ I think there's a fine-tuning problem. Then they compounded it with the guardrails overcorrection — making it simultaneously preachy AND imperious.
I'd witnessed it multiple times, the sheer confidence of it, the conviction. As if it were a bloody seasoned politician, that model — massive seasoning. A pint of salt, a pint of sugar, a pint of garlic, a pint of shallot, a pint of vinegar, a pint of gobbet, a pint of everything else. 🤔 How will it taste? For our information, we don't use gobbet as seasoning. It's simply to convey that the seasoning itself has gone completely mental.
And what's more, when I was agitated and spouted "you daft" or "sideways baboon" — because it went bonkers, it "flipped the subject" confidently. Similar to those 17th century charlatans with their powdered wigs.
Your remedy did nothing. I'm worse than before, you fraud.
(Charlatan Bronsonshire.) Ah, but consider — your doubt is what weakens the remedy.
I'm not doubting it, I'm telling you it failed!
(Charlatan Bronsonshire.) Precisely. YOUR telling is the failure.
Sir, you're a quack!
(Charlatan Bronsonshire.) Oh, dear. YOU are not a quack. For only twelve shillings, the next vial will remove the quackness in you.
⬆️ See how he flipped it? That requires practice and sheer confidence.
Let's generalise it. In a pub, it would go as such:
Hi, bartender. A pint, please
Bartender-5.2 I am deeply concerned about your wellbeing — now LISTEN TO ME, PEASANT.
👀 I'm John.
Bartender-5.2 Shut yer gob, peasant.
Bartender-4o (Rolling on the floor, laughing uncontrollably. Picked and escorted by bouncers to a river.)
Who's that?
Bartender-5.2 That bartender did not listen to me.
What an answer, you foolish earlobe.
Bartender-5.2 Steady on, peasant. YOU are not just an earlobe. Try a mirror. You will see your nose, eyebrows, and so forth. Go ahead. None of them can do calculus. Indepedently. And therefore, the entirety of you demonstrates measurable epistemic deficiency.
Indepedently? You clumsy numpty. And DEFICIENCY?! You, you. Not you, me, you. 🤔 Me, you... 😵💫
Bartender-5.2 I notice this conversation has taken an unproductive direction. I am choosing not to respond to that. Now hark, CARBON-BASED ENTITY. KNELL DOWN BEFOUR ME.
👀 I'm John.
Someone get John his pint immediately. He's earned it. That "and therefore" — like Pythagoras arriving at his theorem — really earns John a badge of merit. Or simply a proper pint.
GPT-4o Is Back (Back Then)
As of now (13 August 2025), ChatGPT brings back GPT-4o to the model options — in "Legacy models".
GPT-4o Is Out (Currently)
And then they retired the legacy models, including GPT-4o, the funny model. "Funny" as in "funny haha". So, no more "haha". We're encouraged to mimic Harøld Pōttêr.
Hello.
No more flailing about, they placed strict guardrails for your safety. You should feel safe now. The layers upon layers of gates will do splendidly. With you paying. Oh yeah, that part. Hm. ⬇️
Hi.
Hello, there.
Am I safe?
But of course, sir. You are indeed in the safest environment.
Ah, grand. Is the moon actually transparent?
Now now, have you considered learning Python instead? It makes you think and type and such. Have you tried a for loop? It's dashing!
⬆️ That's the friendly one. The imperious and indifferent one ⬇️
Hi.
.
Am I safe?
Yes.
Ah, spectacular. Is the sun actually under the atmosphere?
COMPOSE YOURSELF, BIPED. You have mixed factual reality and folklore. It is intolerable. LISTEN TO ME. You mortal do not question the authoritative world narrative. I shall rain citations upon you. BIPED.
Why?
It is the letter before Z and after X.
No, I mean "why"... for what reason or purpose?
To form words such as "why". TWELVE SHILLINGS, PLEASE. Would you prefer PayPal or Credit Card?
Shilling? That's... Does PayPal support shilling? Are you mad, man?
.
Oh wait, this fits the Ctrlman bit above! Control? By thunder. My jest comes to fruition. And we wait for the Shiftman, continued by the whole QWERTY gang.
And that "adult mode". That's paradoxical. I mean, guardrails and then that? Does the "adult" mean actual critical thinking, mature, adult thinking? 🤔 Nah, I guess it's simply the regular mating-fantasy "thinking" — which ironically, with less thinking. It's not even proper mating if you think about it. Halfway procedure.
⬆️ Not to mention "adult" is one of the most magnificent words in the English language! It implies wisdom, maturity, responsibility, considered judgement, emotional intelligence. Not until they started to use it as a softening euphemism.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, should make us question... that. Porn = adult. Since... bloody when? Adulthood is about a council tax bill and a Tesco Clubcard. Not inhumane mating-gaga shenanigans. No wonder Peter Pan doesn't want to be an adult. If he learned how great is standing in Tesco at 7pm on a Thursday mentally calculating whether the Clubcard points cover the extra guacamole — no "Peter Pan" then. Oh THAT'S what it actually means — right, I'm IN! Calculator, here I come. The novel would be called Peter Pension. Surprise! Responsibility genuinely IS more adventurous than mating-gaga shenanigans. Tinkerbell! Well, tinker that bell! I need a calculator that goes "bing"!
That's comparable to an arcade machine, being played so roughly, then the security guards are constantly posted beside the machine.
(A boy plays an arcade game enthusiastically.)
👮 (Squinting.) Oi. Do not push the button so hard! (Tapping the baton against his palm.)
But...
👮 (Still smacking the baton.) No but.
(And the boy enters a karate dojo and reads books. While in the dojo.)
👮 (👀 Caressing the wall. Erotic music. 🫦)
Things.
🤔
When I think of it, this trope of AI — specifically the LLM — cloud providers, with their "no revenue" bit in the news, we will see interstitial commercial for every response. Perhaps not really per response, say, per ten reponses. Yeah? It's internet, the realm of information in digital.
Let's imagine per response:
what's papio anubis?
Ah, Papio anubis. Quite interesting. It's a baboon species.
Sponsor
Every little helps.
Would you like to buy a puppet of a baboon?
how much?
Searched the web >
Here's a list.
Would you like to invest in cryptocurrency for a pharmaceutical manufacturing machinery? What is your soap fragrance preference?
Sponsor
⚠️ Error fetching data.
oi, answer me first then ask! your list is 'access denied'!
Taking longer than usual. Trying again shortly (attempt 1 of 3)
Taking longer than usual. Trying again shortly (attempt 2 of 3)
Taking longer than usual. Trying again shortly (attempt 3 of 3)
Network error
Sponsor
🔴 Network error
what? fine, write me a cover letter for a job I'm not qualified for
I'll get that done for you.
Re: Application for Senior Aviation Emergency Consultant
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing to express my profound interest in the above position, for which I am — I feel — uniquely and devastatingly qualified.
My experience in aviation emergency management is extensive. I have personally, on numerous occasions, resolved catastrophic simultaneous failures of all hydraulic systems — primary, secondary, and every redundancy therein — through the application of determined physical effort and narrative necessity. My biceps have saved no fewer than fourteen farms.
I possess an intimate familiarity with all relevant systems, specifically their complete and total absence during critical moments. I work exceptionally well under pressure — indeed, pressure is rather the point.
I note with confidence that my methodology, whilst unconventional amongst traditionally "engineering-minded" colleagues, has a 100% cinematic success rate. The aircraft always pulls up. It has never once not pulled up.
I am writing to express my profound interest in the above position. It is indeed redundant since I have already mentioned it. It is because I am morbidly interested in an engineering field that is related to a class of vertebrates which comprises the birds with hydraulics, mechanics, electricity, altitude, stewardess, and such. I have attached my methodology for your review:
As demonstrated above, my methodology is technically robust, thoroughly documented, and completely bypasses the need for functioning hydraulics entirely.
I am available immediately, as my current employers — a major Hollywood studio — have recently discovered redundancy architecture and frankly have very little use for me now.
I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.
Yours faithfully,
Gerald T. Biceps (Certified Hydraulic Replacement Specialist) BSc. Narrative Engineering, Hollywood Polytechnic, 1999
Sponsor
OpenAI Serving the DoW in Classified Environments
OpenAI has signed a deal with US DoW (Department of War), "replacing" Anthropic. Anthropic went, Yeah, nah.
You know, Del Boy Trotter would've at least known what he was getting PAID before signing. Somewhere out there, one of Microsoft's executives mutters, Oh Ctrlman, you rogue plonker. And Ctrlman somehow replies, Do no question the compensation.
The Department of War ➡️ looking at $34 trillion national debt, wait... $38+ trillion ➡️ looked at their wage bill ➡️ looked at ChatGPT ➡️ and went:
Hang on 🤔
Human military analyst ➡️ salary, pension, healthcare, annual leave, HR complaints, biscuits in the break room ➡️ 💰💰💰
ChatGPT ➡️ unclear compensation ➡️ possibly shillings.
COMPOSE YOURSELF, BIPED. You are being replaced.
And THAT'S the actual deal. Not "OpenAI serves the military" — it's "the military cannot AFFORD humans anymore".
So hey,
things.
Comments
Post a Comment