Skip to main content

High School Maths: Proof 1 ≠ 0

First of all —

— of course, 1 ≠ 0.

One is NOT zero.

If they were similar, blimey! Imagine how the bridge construction would be and how many of us would chew beams.

The steps:

chair ≠ banana

Counterexample: Bob ate a chair yesterday.

Hi, Bob. It was your boardroom meeting suggestion which led to the two-layer right-click menu in Windows 11, innit? ðŸĪ” Or was it meating?


Let's dissect the proof from Mudd Math Fun Facts which yields 1 = 0 — the link is gone now.


Quoted

A bit paraphrased.

It looks fine at first — with a baffling final line.

BUT!

There is a subtle — but actually a MASSIVE — flaw in it.


The Error Occurred at the Division Step

Since x = y, if we use (x - y) as the divisor, that means we're dividing both sides with 0 (zero).

Let's have a look at the the quadratic equation (the dividend) which is being divided:

$x² - y² = xy - y²$

The part which isn't acceptable is when 0 on both sides are divided also by 0.

${(x² - y²)}/{(x - y)} = {(xy - y²)}/{(x - y)}$

Once again, since $x = y$, hence:

$(x - y) = (x² - y²) = (xy - y²) = 0$

If we substitute the manipulation with the actual values:

$0/0 = 0/0$

❓❓

$0/0$   is indeterminate.

Meaning, it has NO ACTUAL VALUE.

It's a DEFINITION in mathematics.

indeterminate = indeterminate ⁉️

Not in mathematics, it's indeterminate.

Indeterminate means the expression could represent many possible values depending on context — so we cannot pin down a single answer.

In English (language), in term of sameness, indeed indeterminate is indeterminate, they're the same words — but not in mathematics, as indeterminate is not a value.

It's an uncertainty.

For instance:

  • Uncertainty A: Will Bob take a shower?
  • Uncertainty B: Is that tea poisonous?

We can't say uncertainty A is equal to uncertainty B. ðŸĪ” Even though both are an uncertainty. Well, Bob SchrÃķdinger will and will not take a shower with both poisonous tea and regular tea.

Right. So.

Meaning, it MUST be stopped at the subtraction step.

Other operations (+, -, exponent, root, logarithmic, integral, etc.) besides division can be added, but it will certainly give the same result. That is 0 = 0 (or other same number, 1 = 1, 2 = 2, etc.)

Or, we can do another type of different starting manipulation for those variables ($x$ and $y$), and we'll still be using the 0 division to achieve "$1 = 0$".

In conclusion, the proof manipulation above is a jolly time to check our keenness in algebra and arithmetic. This is categorised under —

fallacies based on division by zero

— trope.

🙂‍↕️
Monkey Raptor uses cookies for analytics, advertisements, and functionality. Privacy Policy