JavaScript has two timing methods:
setInterval(function[or]expression, duration)
Description:
This will repetitively invoke a function or evaluate an expression with a given (static) duration (millisecond).
To set different (dynamic) duration, we need to stop the current timer, usingclearInterval()
, then re-run the timer.setTimeout(function[or]expression, duration)
Description:
This will delay a function call or an expression evaluation with a given duration (millisecond), for just one time (no repetition). The timeout can be reset with
clearTimeout()
.
Neither one above has option to set different duration on each execution.
But, we can initiate first duration, then clear the timer, modify the duration, then rerun the timer. Essentially, create a conventional loop to wrap the timer we use. So that we can clear and rerun the timer repetitively.
In the coding below, I implemented the setInterval
. But, actually it should use setTimeout
. Explanation below the coding. For now, let's see it.
JavaScript
This is the JavaScript I typed earlier → updated Aug 19, 2018.
In that typing above, the timer is reset repetitively using clearInterval
until the index reaches the limit given.
That way, we can set new different duration on each invocation.
This idea is actually creating a LOOP, not based on the setInterval
repetition itself. There's no way to do it solely depending on setInterval
, we need "something" to wrap it, like, a loop-er. It can be a defined function, or using do-while
, while
, or for
loop block. The title above is invalid of course. I'm not sure what's the correct term, but the word "loop" should be in it.
So, using a function, I create a loop of that function, rerun from within the function block if it hasn't reached a given limit/condition. And between executions, there's a (dynamic) time interval (pause), using the multiplier
(fixed) combined with the i
(variable). The pause should be done using setTimeout
.
Uh, so the coding above, setInterval
and clearInterval
can be safely (should be) replaced with setTimeout
and clearTimeout
, because it's called once and then cleared right away. Hence, the invalid title. Oh well.
Side note
Anyhow, this is the skeleton of looping using a function:
Be thorough when defining the condition, loop break condition. Because, if it never reaches the expectation, the loop will go infinitely. A fixed limit as loop safeguard is recommended for testing. As such:
HTML elements
The basic styling (CSS)
Why do I wanna create different duration?
That is an interesting query.
Links
- The independent page of that demo over there
- The other hilarious example using both
setInterval
andsetTimeout
, but with additional thingies, at Thor - The neato answer about setting dynamic duration using
setTimeout
timing method on Stack Overflow
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tell me what you think...